New national business names legislation replaces current state systems

 

From 28 May 2012, the regulation and administration of business names throughout Australia will shift from the current state and territory based system to a national system regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

The new national scheme will introduce a number of efficiencies into the business name regime in Australia, including:

  • one register and registration process — with registration of new business names taking effect Australia-wide; and
  • easing the administrative burden of registering and maintaining many registrations for one name.
  • to address the confusion caused under the current system that allows identical, or nearly identical, names to be registered in various states and territories. The new system will prevent identical, or nearly identical, business names from being registered.

What happens with current business name registrations?

One state or territory If you currently have a business name registered in a state or territory, then you will not be required to register it again with ASIC. Instead, ASIC will automatically transfer all current business names registered in any state or territory to the national register. The registration details from the previously registered business name, including the principal place of business and expiry date, will be transferred to the new register.

More than one state or territory If you have a business name registered in more than one state or territory, then each of those registrations will be transferred to the new register. You may then decide:

  • to retain all the registrations, or:
  • to keep one business name registration (for example, the one with the latest expiry date) and to cancel the others.

However, ASIC has said[1] that if it is able to reliably determine that the business names are identical and registered to the same holder then it may act on its own to combine multiple identical registrations.

Identical business names in different jurisdictions owned by different people When the business names are transferred to the new register, there may be two or more identical or nearly identical business names registered in different states or territories to different people. To reduce confusion, ASIC has said that it will provide additional information on the new register to assist people to differentiate between identical, or nearly identical, business names – for example:

  • the state or territory in which the business name was registered; or
  • the former state or territory business name registration number.

If these identifiers are not sufficient to reduce confusion, then ASIC may add a distinguishing word as an additional identifier – for example, the name of the relevant state or territory. Although this identifier will not form part of the business name, it will help people distinguish between identical registered business names. ASIC will notify the people who own the relevant business names before making any changes.

Posted in Business, Law | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Director penalty regime: Draft legislation

The government has released exposure draft legislation to change the director penalty regime. The main aspects of the proposed amendments involve:

  • expanding the director penalty regime to superannuation guarantee (SG) amounts
  • ensuring that directors cannot have their director penalties remitted by placing their company into administration or liquidation when unpaid pay-as-you-go (PAYG) withholding or SG amounts remain unpaid three months after the due dates
  • restricting access to PAYG withholding credits for company directors and their associates where the company has failed to pay withheld amounts to the Commissioner of Taxation
Posted in Law, Tax | Leave a comment

Off-market Transactions – new rules for Self Managed Super Funds

Although the legislation has yet to be introduced into Parliament, the Australian Government’s intentions regarding off-market transactions are set out in the Stronger Super Information Pack, published on 21 September 2011 and are due to come into effect from 1 July 2012.

What are the new off-market transfer rules?

From 1 July 2012:

  • Where a market for an asset exists – all acquisitions and disposals between SMSF trustees and related parties must be conducted through the relevant market or exchange.
  • Where there is no underlying market – the transaction must be supported by a valuation obtained from a properly qualified independent valuer.

For example:

  • where a SMSF trustee is seeking to purchase shares in an ASX listed company, the trustee must purchase them from the market, such as through a broker.
  • where the acquisition or disposal involves property, a valuation will be required.

 

At present, listed securities can be purchased directly from a related party, without the need to engage a broker to give effect to the transfer.

After the reforms take effect, SMSF trustees will no longer be permitted to purchase listed securities directly from related parties of the fund. Rather, SMSF trustees will be required to acquire the securities from the relevant market or exchange.

Posted in Law, Superannuation | Leave a comment